BRAZIL / PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION / 2026
A country of many electoral stories.
Explore the first round, municipality by municipality. See the results, compare the geography with 2022, and find the places you know.
Find your municipality ↗● Official first-round results · TSE
TSE count date: not recorded in this publication
Publication generated (UTC): Oct 6, 2026
The 2026 first round
Explore the official candidate vote counts and shares of valid votes.
FLAVIO NANTES BOLSONARO47.0%
56,104,503 votesLUIZ INÁCIO LULA DA SILVA45.2%
53,879,538 votesAll candidate results
AUGUSTO JORGE CURY2.9%
3,448,569 votesRENAN ANTONIO FERREIRA DOS SANTOS2.2%
2,675,887 votesRONALDO RAMOS CAIADO2.2%
2,605,148 votesROMEU ZEMA NETO0.3%
326,488 votesSAMARA MARTINS DA SILVA FEITOSA0.1%
122,911 votesHERTZ DA CONCEICAO DIAS0.0%
43,103 votesCLARIANA ZACARKIM BARAO0.0%
40,043 votesEDMILSON SILVA COSTA0.0%
22,693 votesWILSON GRASSI JUNIOR0.0%
16,881 votesRUI COSTA PIMENTA0.0%
15,024 votesFirst-round leader: FLAVIO NANTES BOLSONARO
The gap between the top two1.87 pp
Valid votes119,300,788
Turnout78.9%
First-round leadership does not mean the election has been won. National totals include overseas voting.
Source: TSE · validated publicationHow is this calculated? ↗Sources and provenance ↗
How each municipality voted
A closer look at the country
Choose a layer, then search or select a municipality to see its results.
2022 → 2026
What changed since 2022?
These national comparisons use the same comparable places in both first rounds, including overseas voting. They exclude municipalities without a 2022 baseline. They are not a subtraction of the full national results.
No 2022 baseline: BOA ESPERANÇA DO NORTE.
Turnout
Who came to vote?
Compare attendance with the registered electorate, then explore differences between municipalities. Turnout includes people who cast blank or null ballots.
Explore the turnout map ↗78.9%
- People who attended
- 125,275,835
- Registered electorate
- 158,745,502
- Reported abstentions
- 33,469,244
Turnout is the number who attended divided by the registered electorate.
Source: TSE · validated publicationHow is this calculated? ↗Sources and provenance ↗
National context
Which places mattered to the margin?
These ranked municipalities made the largest positive or negative differences to the national Lula–Flávio margin under the published removal metric. Select a place to locate it and see its results.
National Lula–Flávio margin: −1.87 pp
How is this calculated?
This is the national valid-vote margin minus the margin with this municipality removed. Positive values raise Lula’s margin relative to Flávio; negative values lower it. It describes the result and does not measure causal importance. The values do not add up to the national margin.
Percentage points of national margin
Raised the Lula–Flávio margin
- SALVADOR, BA+0.49 pp
- SÃO PAULO, SP+0.37 pp
- FORTALEZA, CE+0.20 pp
- RECIFE, PE+0.16 pp
- TERESINA, PI+0.13 pp
- SÃO LUÍS, MA+0.10 pp
- FEIRA DE SANTANA, BA+0.07 pp
- JUAZEIRO DO NORTE, CE+0.06 pp
- PORTO ALEGRE, RS+0.06 pp
- ARACAJU, SE+0.05 pp
Lowered the Lula–Flávio margin
- CURITIBA, PR−0.23 pp
- BRASÍLIA, DF−0.17 pp
- GOIÂNIA, GO−0.16 pp
- MANAUS, AM−0.15 pp
- JOINVILLE, SC−0.14 pp
- CAMPO GRANDE, MS−0.10 pp
- LONDRINA, PR−0.10 pp
- NOVA IGUAÇU, RJ−0.09 pp
- BOA VISTA, RR−0.09 pp
- BLUMENAU, SC−0.08 pp
These values do not add up to the national margin.
Source: TSE · validated publicationHow is this calculated? ↗Sources and provenance ↗